| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o>: |
| 4 |
> Actualy i would like to hear what we in KDE did too, we publish into |
| 5 |
> the tree as 0 days bump mostly since 4.2 and 4.1 was in the tree |
| 6 |
> right away when we had working configuration. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Your bumping is excellent, no discussion here. |
| 9 |
Gnome does a really good job in figuring out what packages need to go |
| 10 |
stable along with their newest release, maybe that is easier for them. |
| 11 |
With the ongoing KDE 4 stabilisation, I have seen a lot of |
| 12 |
stabilisation requests filed by Samuli, which should have been already |
| 13 |
there, filed by the KDE team. Figuring out what will be broken with |
| 14 |
such a major release and trying to get the stable tree on par is what |
| 15 |
eats a lot of time for us architecture developers...you can ease that |
| 16 |
by researching beforehand (with a stable chroot for example). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
V-Li |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
| 22 |
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
<URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/> |
Archives