Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
Subject: Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 22:48:22 -0600
On Thu, 29 May 2008 01:13:16 +0200
Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> wrote:

> So, do you think it should be enabled by default?

Yes please. :)  I haven't had any problems in the couple of months
i've been using it.


-- 
fonts, gcc-porting,                               by design, by neglect
mips, treecleaner,                        for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo     EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
References:
RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
-- Marius Mauch
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
Next by thread:
Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
Previous by date:
RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
Next by date:
Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.