Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
Subject: Re: fltk version 1.1 is the one to go for
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:13:27 +0200
On 03/25/2010 11:01 PM, linux@... wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I wanted to report that cinepaint (which as of today is not in
> portage) compiles fine on my gentoo box which has been emerge-synced
> only yesterday. It uses however not the fltk-2.0 which is emerged by
> default but the version fltk-1.1.10. 
> 
> On the fltk website they say however that actually 1.1 is the stable
> version, whereas fltk-2.0 is an experimental version which is not as
> much maintained as 1.1. By the way, 1.3 is the development version.
> 
> In case anybody would like to take care of this, I won't be able to do
> so during the next few weeks.
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> Gabriel
> 
> P.S.: I actually only tested the latest cvs version. I will test the
> latest stable tarball and then see whether cinepaint is fully
> functional, and will report back any problems I might encounter.
> 
> 

http://bugs.gentoo.org/278375 is for cinepaint, not the mailinglist, but
thanks anyway.

- samuli


References:
fltk version 1.1 is the one to go for
-- linux
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
fltk version 1.1 is the one to go for
Next by thread:
RFC: changing ssl use flag descriptions and unify behavior
Previous by date:
fltk version 1.1 is the one to go for
Next by date:
Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.