List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 04:37:05PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> I thought he wanted flags that broke upgrading between GCC 3.4 and 4.1.
> tree-loop-linear wasn't in 3.4. If you want flags that just break
> stuff with 4.1 you can include -ftree-vectorize.
> > The objective here was mainly to point out some things that users are
> > doing that are causing breakages, leading to bugs that are ultimately
> > marked INVALID after much tracing.
> Like using CFLAGS not on the Safe CFLAGS page? ;)
One needs to use some common sense as a developer in evaluating user
CFLAGS - because there are plenty of flags that are safe, but aren't
listed on that page.
Several years ago, I wrote a package that was the forerunner of the
'Safe CFLAGS' page - genflags. It was close to unmaintable at the time
however, so it's suffered a lot of bit-rot. With the advent of
libcpuinfo, and x86info being written, it stands a much better chance of
giving useful output, but that still does not supersede the common sense
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : email@example.com
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85