Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
On 13:37 Wed 21 Sep 2011, Rich Freeman wrote:
> I LIKE the contribution of linux distros, and I don't really want to
> see a move towards the Windows world where I have 10 different
> auto-updaters running (or worse - no auto-update and I'm just stuck
> with manual checks). I also don't like every browser having its own
> copy of everything from libz to webkit to sqllite.
For chrome at least versions and updating are going to become invisible.
Google has indicated that they are going to do all the updating
invisibly in the background and once that is working they'll remove the
version number too. They'll push the security fixes (and just whatever
they think enhances your browsing experience) directly to your computer.
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
|
| References: |
[RFC] How do we handle stabilisations of not-exactly-maintained packages
-- Tomáš Chvátal
|
Re: [RFC] How do we handle stabilisations of not-exactly-maintained packages
-- Rich Freeman
|
Re: [RFC] How do we handle stabilisations of not-exactly-maintained packages
-- Duncan
|
Re: Re: [RFC] How do we handle stabilisations of not-exactly-maintained packages
-- Rich Freeman
|
Re: Re: [RFC] How do we handle stabilisations of not-exactly-maintained packages
-- Thomas Kahle
|
Re: Re: [RFC] How do we handle stabilisations of not-exactly-maintained packages
-- Rich Freeman
|
| Navigation: |
|
Lists:
gentoo-dev:
< Prev
By Thread
Next >
< Prev
By Date
Next >
|
| Previous by thread: |
| Re: Re: [RFC] How do we handle stabilisations of not-exactly-maintained packages |
| Next by thread: |
| Packages up for grabs: virtual/{cron,dev-manager,inetd,libc,linux-sources,man,os-headers,package-manager,skkserv,ssh,w3m} |
| Previous by date: |
| Re: new `usex` helper |
| Next by date: |
| Re: finding reverse dependencies for arch testing (and other purposes) |
|