1 |
>> Have you ever looked into Makefile.PL in the past? Or have you even |
2 |
>> taken a look at the Makefile.PL.in is it existed? It shows that many of |
3 |
>> the "-l"-options are generated by configure. (Makefile.PL.in is template |
4 |
>> for configure - you surely know that) |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> Or are we talking about some seperate PerlMagick-Distribution? I'm |
7 |
>> talking about the PerlMagick which comes with imagemagick's tarball. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> Actually, Makefile.PL should use pkgconfig or whatever is available to |
10 |
>> detect all those "-l" options - or actually it's also sufficient to only |
11 |
>> do -lMagick - who knows? |
12 |
>> |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Well, as former maintainer of PerlMagick in Gentoo, I can tell you that |
15 |
> the way we used to do it was to take the tarball that is used to build |
16 |
> imagemagick and reuse it for building perlmagick, building only the perl |
17 |
> portions and ensuring that we were binding against the correct libraries |
18 |
> on $root. But hey, what do I know, I only maintained it for 2 or 3 |
19 |
> years. |
20 |
|
21 |
I asked questions about all those -l options that include libraries - |
22 |
but which libraries have to be included while linking the Magick.so of |
23 |
the perl-module highly depends on the use-flags. |
24 |
|
25 |
So you didn't answer the question. That you were the |
26 |
PerlMagick-maintainer for a log time - well - as long as nobody |
27 |
complains, i wouldn't look at the command line with which Magick.so is |
28 |
linked, too. So i guess you just don't know what i'm talking about. |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
I'm sorry, that my patches don't work. I will take a closer look immediatly. |