Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o>
Subject: Re: RFC: optinal run time dependencies
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:19:37 +0200
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:38:19 +0400
Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> wrote:

> Starting with EAPI=X new prefix ~ is allowed in IUSE use flag
> definition. Use
> flags prefixed with ~ are not allowed to be used anywhere but only
> inside
> PDEPEND dependency specification. This USE flags are used during
> dependency
> resolution as normal. Package manager is allowed to skip
> re-installation of the
> package due to this USE flag change but still it should record such
> USE change
> into package database.

How about packages having optional rt dependencies on other packages'
optional dependencies?

> Comments?
> 
> May be instead of ~ introduce three additional prefixes (~ and another
> two for +~ and -~ cases)?

I think a USE_EXPAND prefix could be used for that as well.

We could then extend the backwards compatibility to cause complete
package rebuilds with older PMs (EAPIs) and only dep-switches for newer
ones.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
References:
RFC: optinal run time dependencies
-- Peter Volkov
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: RFC: optinal run time dependencies
Next by thread:
Re: RFC: optinal run time dependencies
Previous by date:
Re: RFC: optinal run time dependencies
Next by date:
Re: RFC: optinal run time dependencies


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.