Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
Subject: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:04:45 +0300
Hi

As many of you have already noticed, there are some arches that are quite
slow on stabilizations. This leads to deprecated stabilizations e.g a
package is stabilized after 60 days which makes that version of
the specific package obsolete and not worth to stabilize anymore.

I would suggest to introduce a new rule where a stabilization bug may close
after 30 days. Arches that fail to stabilize it within this timeframe
they will simply don't have this package stable for them.

Moreover, slow arches introduce another problem as well. If a package is
marked stabled for their arch, but this package is quite old, and they fail to
stabilize a new version, we ( as maintainers ) can't drop the very old
( and obsolete ) version of this package because we somehow will break
the stable tree for these arches. How should we act in this case?
Keep the old version around forever just to say that "hey, they do have
a stable version for our exotic arch".

Whilst I do understand that these arches are understaffed and they can't keep
up with the increased stabilization load like x86/amd64 do, I still
think that slow stabilization leads to an obsolete stable tree which I
doesn't make sense to me after all.

Thoughts?

-- 
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
Attachment:
pgprZwWq5Smif.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
-- Nirbheek Chauhan
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
-- Tony \"Chainsaw\" Vroon
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
-- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
-- Auke Booij
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
-- Olivier CrĂȘte
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
-- Patrick Lauer
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Lastrite: xulrunner-bin
Next by thread:
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
Previous by date:
Re: FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages
Next by date:
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.