Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:25:26 +1000, Andrew Ross wrote:
snip...
>>
>> That's a laugh! Problem is that no devs seem to get approved in a timely
>> fashion.
>
> As a recently recruited developer, I'd just like to say that I was very
> happy with the approval time of my recruitment bug (#139633), which was
> filed on 2006-07-07 and resolved on 2006-08-08.
>
> I understand that not all recruitments occur as quickly as mine,
you are the exception.
>
> If recruiters are taking that long, but it's due primarily to a lack of
> manpower,
or poor organization.
> Not all developers are cut out to be recruiters, and I'm sure some of
> those who have what it takes would rather work on something else :-)
> Much like infrastructure, my impression is that being a recruiter isn't
> exactly a glamorous role. On top of that, the actions a recruiter must
> perform for each recruitment aren't exactly 5 minute jobs:
>
months of silence in the many cases unlike yours are rude and inexcusable.
>
> Cheers
>
> Andrew
glad you were an exception.
--
Peter
--
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
|
| Replies: |
Re: Re: Delay in approval of new developers
-- Jochen Maes
|
| References: |
seeds, GLEPs, and projects
-- Grant Goodyear
|
Re: seeds, GLEPs, and projects
-- Simon Stelling
|
Re: seeds, GLEPs, and projects
-- Ciaran McCreesh
|
Re: seeds, GLEPs, and projects
-- Simon Stelling
|
Re: seeds, GLEPs, and projects
-- Mike Pagano
|
Re: seeds, GLEPs, and projects
-- Peter
|
Delay in approval of new developers
-- Andrew Ross
|
| Navigation: |
|
Lists:
gentoo-dev:
< Prev
By Thread
Next >
< Prev
By Date
Next >
|
| Previous by thread: |
| Delay in approval of new developers |
| Next by thread: |
| Re: Re: Delay in approval of new developers |
| Previous by date: |
| Delay in approval of new developers |
| Next by date: |
| Re: Re: Delay in approval of new developers |
|