Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving the updated apache and associated ebuilds back into package.mask
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 22:39:19
Message-Id: 4266D9F5.2050008@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving the updated apache and associated ebuilds back into package.mask by Lance Albertson
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Lance Albertson wrote:
5 > Why do you have to
6 > push all these improvements on the current stable line of apache (2.0.x) ? Why
7 > can't these changes just be used in the upcoming alpha/beta releases and totally
8 > be implemented by the time they move to the next stable release. Asking people
9 > to suddenly change midway through is a major pain. If they knew that these kinds
10 > of changes were going to happen in >2.0.x, then it would be easier for them to
11 > manage.
12
13 Actually, I think it's a better time to make major changes in ebuild
14 handling when there aren't major changes in source code. It's easier to
15 isolate problems.
16
17 Donnie
18 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
19 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
20 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
21
22 iD8DBQFCZtn0XVaO67S1rtsRAsQaAKDpmHZ8DKccrgD7IkUwxXWKvwrNwQCeKxis
23 M8AnWWRto+owGpNRUXNXGXc=
24 =jXx3
25 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
26 --
27 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list