Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Dale <rdalek1967@...>
Subject: Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:33:08 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> the time has come when baselayout-2.x and openrc are stable on all of
> our architectures. That means that we should look into removing
> baselayout-1 from the tree, removing support for it from our init
> scripts and removing support for migration from the openrc
> ebuilds.
>
> 1. we can remove baselayout-1 from the tree, I think, as soon as bug
> #368597 is closed, because once that is done, all new installs should
> be based on baselayout-2.x and openrc.
>
> 2. The next step is to reverse the changes we made in bug #273138 and
> any other init scripts that have been reacting differently depending on
> whether they were under baselayout-1 or openrc. Optionally we could
> rework init scripts to take advantage of openrc specific features such
> as the *_pre/post functions at this point.
>
> Once this is completed, the init scripts in portage will not support
> baselayout-1, so if anyone is still on baselayout-1 we should find a way
> to encourage them to migrate -- maybe a news item? Also, we should come
> up with a time window that will be published in this news item that will
> mark the end of supporting migration from baselayout-1 to openrc.
>
> 3. The final step is to remove the code from the openrc ebuilds that
> supports migrating from baselayout-1.x. Once we do this another news
> item should be published since this is the point of no return; anyone
> running a baselayout-1 based system will have to re-install to upgrade
> once we drop this support.
>
> Please discuss. Did I leave out any steps? Are there any  points I have
> left out besides the time window between steps 2 and 3? Should there be
> a time window before removing baselayout-1? What about between steps 1
> and 2? What do you consider to be a reasonable time window before we
> stop supporting migration from baselayout-1 to baselayout-2/openrc? I'm
> thinking on the order of a few months, but not years.
>
> Thanks,
>
> William
>
>    

As a user, if a person hasn't upgraded in about 6 months, they may as 
well reinstall anyway.  That is usually the advice given on -user.  
After a year without updating, it is certainly easier and most likely 
faster to reinstall.  Almost everything will be updated and there is 
usually a few upgrades that are touchy and will have to be dealt with.

My thoughts, after a year, baselayout1 could be laid to rest.  At that 
point, a reinstall would be the easiest and fastest anyway.

Just a users perspective.  YMMV.

Dale

:-)  :-)


References:
rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x
-- William Hubbs
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x
Next by thread:
Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x
Previous by date:
rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x
Next by date:
Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.