| 1 |
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:58:20 +0100 |
| 2 |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan.jr@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> So we have some automatic reporting. Can we have a webpage for |
| 4 |
> that, or a mailing list that people can subscribe to? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Mailing list: http://bugs.gentoo.org/329165 |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I have no idea how to go about doing an automated webpage or other |
| 9 |
integration with other projects. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Do we have some bugs or other actions towards fixing those problems? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Not that I know of. AFAIK problems are dealt with on the basis of |
| 14 |
"whoever sees the email AND has time to fix it." The Releng team |
| 15 |
members in charge of minor arches generally do a pretty good job of |
| 16 |
fixing stuff on a timely basis. Our major arches seem to break more |
| 17 |
frequently, but receive less TLC. Again, manpower and time issues. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> Is it possible to bisect the portage tree and identify a breaking |
| 20 |
> commit? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Beats me. Git would make that easier. From what I can see, anything |
| 23 |
that's ever been done to Python has resulted in breakage. |
Archives