| 1 |
The current bzr eclass uses EBZR_FETCH_CMD="bzr checkout --lightweight" |
| 2 |
to initially fetch the sources. |
| 3 |
The problem with this is though it saves some time and bandwidth on the |
| 4 |
initial fetch it actually ends up using a lot more time and bandwidth |
| 5 |
on every update. |
| 6 |
Ok great I can set EBZR_FETCH_CMD="bzr checkout". |
| 7 |
This solves the initial fetch problems. |
| 8 |
Now when I try and update the bzr eclass function bzr_fetch() has this |
| 9 |
bit of code in it. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
# Run bzr_initial_fetch() only if the branch has not been pulled |
| 12 |
# before or if the existing local copy is a full checkout (as did |
| 13 |
# an older version of bzr.eclass) |
| 14 |
if [[ ! -d ${EBZR_BRANCH_DIR} ]] ; then |
| 15 |
bzr_initial_fetch "${EBZR_REPO_URI}" "${EBZR_BRANCH_DIR}" |
| 16 |
elif [[ -d "${EBZR_BRANCH_DIR}"/.bzr/repository/ ]]; then |
| 17 |
einfo "Re-fetching the branch to save space..." |
| 18 |
rm -rf "${EBZR_BRANCH_DIR}" |
| 19 |
bzr_initial_fetch "${EBZR_REPO_URI}" "${EBZR_BRANCH_DIR}" |
| 20 |
else |
| 21 |
bzr_update "${EBZR_REPO_URI}" "${EBZR_BRANCH_DIR}" |
| 22 |
fi |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Since I did a full checkout with the EBZR_FETCH_CMD="bzr checkout" |
| 25 |
it now deletes the entire previous checked out branch (to save disk space ?) and proceeds to fetch the entire |
| 26 |
source again. |
| 27 |
Why would I ever want to do that ? The whole point of bzr is to save bandwidth not disk space. |
| 28 |
Is there a way arouund this ? |
Archives