| 1 |
I belive it could be achieved by doing this: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
emerge --fetchonly A B && emerge A B |
| 4 |
or |
| 5 |
emerge -f A B && emerge A B |
| 6 |
for short |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Even though it would be nice to have a flag like --fetchfirst (so that one |
| 9 |
do not need to list the ebuilds twice, I still think the portage-system |
| 10 |
will have to go through it twice.) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
BTW what is the id-bug-number of your bug? |
| 13 |
(I believe that it would be nice if we post that as a reference in |
| 14 |
situations like this.) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
All the best, |
| 17 |
Christian |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> Hi! |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Dan Naumov wrote: |
| 22 |
>> Submit this suggestion to Gentoo BugZilla. |
| 23 |
> OK, I did. How long time can it take to develop and commit such a |
| 24 |
> feature to the main portage tree? |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Zizi |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 30 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 31 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 32 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives