| 1 |
2008-07-26 18:06:12 Ryan Hill napisał(a): |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:36:28 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > I would like to suggest new policy stating that packages should |
| 6 |
> > respect LDFLAGS. Small amount of packages which ignore LDFLAGS should |
| 7 |
> > be patched to respect them. Such patches are usually small and easy |
| 8 |
> > to write. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > This policy is required to allow QA team to fix packages which ignore |
| 11 |
> > LDFLAGS. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Um, this already is the policy. We've always fixed bug reports about |
| 14 |
> LDFLAGS being ignored. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Mark Loeser (Halcy0n) (QA project leader) said on 2008-07-24 that this policy |
| 17 |
doesn't exist. I understand that bug reports about LDFLAGS being ignored are |
| 18 |
usually fixed, so I ask for the formal enacting of this policy. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Archives