Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Robert Buchholz <rbu@g.o>
Subject: Re: Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:33:12 +0100
On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Let's try something new. I would like to get opinions from as many
> people as possible about GLEP 55 and alternatives listed here in
> order to get some idea what the general developer pool thinks.

Thanks for opening a spot to voice our opinions within reasonable limits 
and without deadlocked discussions.

To make it brief, I'd very much prefer 3c[0] for the reasons provided by 
others before:
- From what I can see, it provides for all requirements set out by g55.
- There is a backwards-compatible way to implement it.
- It does not expose any more internal metadata than current ebuilds do.
- I see no rush to implement new EAPI features that require drastic
  changes enabled by 1*.
- It provides a constant face for Gentoo, aka we're the guys and gals 
  using the ".ebuild" format.


Robert

[0] Although not with a fixed line limit, but with a strict way to find
    it, i.e. the first occurence of #?\s*EAPI=["']?([a-zA-Z0-9._]+)["']?   
    or similar.
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
References:
Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives
-- Petteri Räty
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: eapi function (Was: Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives)
Next by thread:
Re: Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives
Previous by date:
Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for February 26
Next by date:
Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009)


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.