Archives
Archives
| From: | Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking bugs for bugday? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:02:24 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20100302010205.18765d7s0e4x781s@webmail.df.eu | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking bugs for bugday? by Ioannis Aslanidis |
||
| 1 | Quoting Ioannis Aslanidis <aslanidis@×××××.com>: |
| 2 | > I would prefer to keep the keyword for |
| 3 | > Bugday Members to administer. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | I don't think that sending mails would work well. |
| 6 | If you want extra control/QA for bugday team members |
| 7 | I would propose two different keywords: one for bugday |
| 8 | candidates and one for confirmed bugday bugs. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Any dev could mark bugs as candidates easily and without |
| 11 | delays while you could still reserve acknoledgement to you. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Sebastian |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking bugs for bugday? | Ioannis Aslanidis <aslanidis@×××××.com> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday? | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |