Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Spider <spider@g.o>
Subject: Re: [WIP] gcc 3.3
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 16:20:25 +0200
begin  quote
On 16 May 2003 13:00:53 +0100
Dhruba Bandopadhyay <dhruba@...> wrote:
> 
> There is an ebuild for it on bugzilla and one here and some on forums
> too.  Have you used any of these as a definitive base or is this a new
> creation?

Neither, I wanted a go at it again (I haven't been messing with gcc
since 3.1 days)  so I started from last known working 3.2.3 and went on.
 
> Also, is there any sign of this being entered into hardmasked or
> testig state on portage?

I'm not the maintainer of gcc, so I shall leave that up to Azarah to
decide, let him distill the different builds along with his own
experience to see what goes.   

> 
> I'd be quite keen on testing it out since I have had my fair share of
> pentium4 problems and am desperately hoping an upgrade of gcc will
> sort them out.

It may, so far it appears some old c++ code will barf though. not sure
about glibc and kernel issues either. 

> 
> Pardon my ignorance but have all these patches been commented out to
> prevent resultant problems or because they are no longer necessary?

Thats up to the maintainer, since I havent taken the time to go through
the patches each in turn and verify wether it is needed anymore I just
commented it out to see what happened.  I suspect a lot of them are no
longer necessary, and those that are will have to be re-diffed in a new
manner, not really an easy task.

I suspect the real build won't enter portage until propolice is up in
speed though.

//Spider


-- 
begin  .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end

Attachment:
pgpuZBfn9w2mY.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: [WIP] gcc 3.3
-- David Nielsen
Re: [WIP] gcc 3.3
-- David Nielsen
References:
[WIP] gcc 3.3
-- Spider
Re: [WIP] gcc 3.3
-- Dhruba Bandopadhyay
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: [WIP] gcc 3.3
Next by thread:
Re: [WIP] gcc 3.3
Previous by date:
Re: phoenix-cvs env.d conflict
Next by date:
Re: [WIP] gcc 3.3


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.