Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Mike Auty <ikelos@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 08:16:14 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Peter Volkov wrote:
| Is there any reason why --as-needed is not enabled "by default"?

There's still about 18 open bugs on the tracker[1] for it.  You can see
how many problems it had been causing by the huge number of blocking bugs.

I've been using it for a pretty long time now (probably a couple weeks
after Diego first blogged about it) and don't have many problems at all
(now), but every once in a while a version bump or a new package will
just fail to compile properly and the problem leads back to as-needed.
I'm not sure whether ~arch users would be able to catch all the
as-needed bugs before they hit stable, so I couldn't say whether it
should be enabled by default or not.

I also don't think it would completely eliminate the problems that Diego
mentioned with preserve-libs (there could still be instances where bar
and foo both NEEDED thing.so, but bar had been compiled more recently
and needed thing.so.1 whilst foo needed thing.so.0, and starting bar
would break trying to load both)...

Mike  5:)

[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129413
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkg/qb4ACgkQu7rWomwgFXpl7wCdFhDuZbQOVy1b12dgXbZbSWtj
dIMAn3Z6FDx5HW1KD83JxdboNrQOOap1
=Nca2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
-- Santiago M. Mola
References:
RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
-- Marius Mauch
Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
-- Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Re: Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
-- Marius Mauch
Re: Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
-- Peter Volkov
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
Next by thread:
Re: Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
Previous by date:
Re: Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
Next by date:
Re: Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.