Robert Buchholz schrieb:
> On Monday 30 March 2009, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh schrieb:
>>> So far, we've got this, by agreement of the Council:
>>>
>>> * There will be a default src_install in EAPI 3
>>> * It will have a DOCS variable, or something along those lines.
>>>
>>> I'd like to suggest the following too:
>>>
>>> * If DOCS is explicitly specified, it is an error if anything in it
>>>   doesn't exist.
>>> * If DOCS isn't explicitly specified, it isn't an error if anything
>>> in its default, if it has one, doesn't exist.
>>>
>>> We don't have an implementation yet. So I'll start off with this:
>>>
>>>     default_src_install() {
>>>         emake -j1 DESTDIR="${D}" install
>> Why do you want to force -j1 here?
>>
>> And i had this proposal some months ago, which noone argued against
>> any more (the default list may of course be extended):
> ...
> 
> What Ciaran added was a way to disable installation of default DOCS. The 
> implmenetation we discussed on the thread a while ago does not check 
> whether DOCS is declared but empty.
> I believe the way the DOCS variable is handled in the first example of 
> the thread starter is good for a default_src_install although I don't 
> know if we really need arrays. But why not? :-)

ok, so actually it is the following:

first this part:

default_src_install() {
	if [ -f Makefile ] || [ -f GNUmakefile ] || [ -f makefile ]; then
		emake DESTDIR="${D}" install || die "emake install failed"
	fi

then there are 2 ideas from Ciaran:

1.:

        local d
        if ! declare -p DOCS >/dev/null 2>&1 ; then
            for d in README* ChangeLog AUTHORS NEWS TODO CHANGES \
	            THANKS BUGS FAQ CREDITS CHANGELOG ; do
                [[ -s "${d}" ]] && dodoc "${d}"
            done
        elif declare -p DOCS | grep -q '^declare -a ' ; then
            for d in "${DOCS[@]}" ; do
                dodoc "${d}"
            done
        else
            dodoc ${DOCS}
        fi
    }

and 2.:

    emagicdocs

    emagicdocs() {
        done_docs=
        old_set=$(shopt | grep 'nocaseglob[[:space:]]*on')
        shopt -s nocaseglob
        for d in '' "${DEFAULT_SRC_INSTALL_EXTRA_SUBDIRS[@]}" ; do
            if [[ -n ${d} ]]; then
                [[ -d ${d} ]] || die "${d} is not a dir"
                pushd "${d}" > /dev/null || die "Failed to enter ${d}"
                local docdesttree="${DOCDESTTREE}"
                docinto "${d}"
            fi
            for f in README Change{,s,Log} AUTHORS NEWS TODO ABOUT THANKS {KNOWN_,}BUGS SUBMITTING \
                HACKING FAQ CREDITS PKG-INFO HISTORY PACKAGING MAINTAINER{,S} CONTRIBUT{E,OR,ORS}
RELEASE \
                ANNOUNCE PORTING NOTES PROBLEMS NOTICE "${DEFAULT_SRC_INSTALL_EXTRA_DOCS[@]}"; do
                for p in "${DEFAULT_SRC_INSTALL_EXTRA_PREFIXES[@]}" '' ; do
                    for doc in "${p}"*([[:digit:]])"${f}"{,+([._-])*} ; do
                        if [[ -s "${doc}" ]] ; then
                            for e in "${DEFAULT_SRC_INSTALL_EXCLUDE[@]}" ; do
                                [[ ${doc} == ${e} ]] && continue 2
                            done
                            done_docs="${done_docs} ${d%/}${d:+/}${doc}"
                            dodoc "${doc}"
                        fi
                    done
                done
            done
            if [[ -n ${d} ]]; then
                docinto "${docdesttree}"
                popd > /dev/null || die "Failed to leave ${d}"
            fi
        done
        if [[ -n "${done_docs}" ]] ; then
            echo "Installed docs ${done_docs# }"
        else
            echo "Didn't find any docs to install"
        fi
        [[ -n ${old_set} ]] || shopt -u nocaseglob
    }

Any more comments about this?

> 
> 
>> So what about this funcion for the next EAPI and also implementation
>> in base.eclass?
> 
> Why would you want to implement it in base.eclass when it's in EAPI=3? I 
> can't think of a case where "inherit base" would make things easier 
> than bumping to EAPI=3. In both cases, you might need to change logic 
> within your ebuild and test it.

That ideas was months ago, where EAPI-2 was just introduced and i had no idea when a default
src_install with EAPI-3 could come in, so i suggested base.eclass as alternative, so it could be
used earlier.

-- 
Thomas Sachau

Gentoo Linux Developer