| 1 |
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:14:59 -0600 |
| 2 |
Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 14:17 Wed 16 Feb , Tobias Klausmann wrote: |
| 5 |
> > I think automatically generating per-arch lists and dumping them |
| 6 |
> > on the bug is a nice way to do it. Having a "tabled list" for use |
| 7 |
> > by the maintainer and then generating one comment per |
| 8 |
> > arch-specific list seems like a good idea to me. Yes it is more |
| 9 |
> > verbose on the bug, but that is a little price to pay, I'd say. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
+1 :) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Is using autounmask an option instead? That generates a nice little |
| 14 |
> file with everything that was actually unmasked, assuming it's a |
| 15 |
> single dependency tree of packages. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
autounmask takes ages on slow systems. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
jer |
Archives