Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Greg KH <gregkh@g.o>
Subject: Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:02:29 -0700
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 01:03:24PM +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 15 June 2012 12:45, Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o> wrote:
> > On 15 June 2012 09:58, Greg KH <gregkh@g.o> wrote:
> >> So, anyone been thinking about this?  I have, and it's not pretty.
> >>
> >> Minor details like, "do we have a 'company' that can pay Microsoft to
> >> sign our bootloader?" is one aspect from the non-technical side that I've
> >> been wondering about.
> >
> > Sounds like something the Gentoo Foundation could do.
> 
> I'm certainly not the only one who would be averse to paying Microsoft
> any ransom money.

Sorry, it's really Verisign, although I imagine you still feel the same :)


References:
UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
-- Greg KH
Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
-- Arun Raghavan
Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
-- Ben de Groot
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
Next by thread:
Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
Previous by date:
Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo
Next by date:
Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.