Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alistair Bush <ali_bush@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Phoenix] an official Gentoo wiki
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:02:29
Message-Id: 201004051202.13729.ali_bush@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Phoenix] an official Gentoo wiki by Ben de Groot
1 > 1 - requirements
2 > ================
3 >
4 > In order to choose the best possible wiki implementation, we need to
5 > know our requirements. So what features do you think are essential or
6 > good to have? What syntax would we prefer to use?
7 >
8 > I myself am a big fan of reStructuredText, which is quite simple,
9 > easy to pick up, highly readable, and has a good featureset. Plus, it
10 > is also reusable in other contexts (it is for example widely used in
11 > documentation of Python libraries). MediaWiki, MoinMoin and Trac have
12 > support for rst.
13
14 I'm not overly concerned about what wiki we use. But may I suggest we
15 approach gentoo-wiki to see whether they would like to be involved.
16
17 >
18 > Some others:
19 >
20 > - active upstream (bug fixes, security updates)
21 > - free open source software
22 > - ACLs
23 > - spam prevention measures
24 > - attachments (to upload screenshots for example)
25 > - feeds
26 >
27 > Other distros and open source projects surely have had the same
28 > considerations. Can we find out and learn from them?
29 >
30 >
31 > 2 - maintainers
32 > ===============
33 >
34 > Who is volunteering for maintaining the wiki? We need editors and
35 > moderators, people who look out for quality control and take care of
36 > spam removal. So let's get together a team. I'm sure if we ask on the
37 > forums we'll get some users interested as well.
38
39 I would like to help as I may. Hopefully we can get a good body of users to
40 help as well. I'm of the firm belief that it will be users who should make
41 this idea either fly or crash down hard. Dev's have official means of
42 documenting stuff.
43
44 >
45 >
46 > 3 - edit access
47 > ===============
48 >
49 > Do we keep to the original "free for all" model, with all the spam
50 > that includes, or do we go with registered users only? I think the
51 > latter is the smarter option. I also think we will want to mark
52 > certain pages "official" and lock down editing rights.
53 >
54
55 Registered users only please.
56
57 >
58 > Is there anything else we should consider before getting started?
59
60 What project should we create this under.
61
62 gdp is for official documentation so I don't think it should be under that but
63 it could very well be under userrel. Or it could be a new project.
64
65 I also have some other ideas that I would like to implement once I get around
66 to brain-dumping them. So I will simply ask this question.
67
68 Are there any complimentary services we could offer users besides a wiki?
69 Maybe best to just think about this and not answer it here.
70
71 >
72 > Cheers,
73
74 Alistair

Replies