Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP 56] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions [Clarifications]
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:36:16
Message-Id: 20080815153558.2765b9f6@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP 56] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions [Clarifications] by Doug Goldstein
1 On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:13:26 -0400
2 Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > > What is the benefit?
5
6 > There is none really. Allow all use flags to exist in metadata.xml.
7 > It's really more of a clarification to the GLEP if this is allowed.
8
9 I personally think that this would facilitate a lot of duplication that
10 would ultimately amount to bitrot. Of course having, say, repoman
11 suggest cleanups would be one solution to the problem of bitrot, but
12 then I still fail to see the advantage over having both an IUSE per
13 ebuild as well as maintaining <gentoo-x86/profiles/use.desc>.
14
15 In my opinion the GLEP needs clarification on this matter. It should
16 forbid the use of these empty flag tags, and the DTD should reflect
17 that[1].
18
19
20 Kind regards,
21 JeR
22
23
24 [1] Come to think of it, in the recent metadata.xml / no-herd debate,
25 wasn't having an empty herd tag ever suggested? <herd />

Replies