From: | "Björn Lindström" <bkhl@×××××××××××××.se> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Community driven meta distribution or only distribution (was Re: Several portage trees) | ||
Date: | Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:09:39 | ||
Message-Id: | 20030429190926.GI18711@lucien.dreaming | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Community driven meta distribution or only distribution (was Re: Several portage trees) by Henti Smith |
1 | Henti Smith <bain@×××××××.za> [20030429 19:45]: |
2 | > Maybe change skel can be a fully functional ebuils to do ummm .. |
3 | > nothing .. but have valid and correct ebuild structures and ways of |
4 | > doing things to help guide a new ebuilder in the right direction. |
5 | |
6 | ...or maybe portage should include a neat and well commented ebuild for |
7 | GNU Hello World. I believe Debian has something like that for deb. |
8 | |
9 | -- |
10 | Björn Lindström <bkhl@×××××××××××××.se> |
11 | Home page: http://hem.fyristorg.com/bkhl/ |
12 | Blog: http://bkhl.livejournal.com/ |
13 | Elektrubadur demo: http://hem.fyristorg.com/bkhl/elektrubadur/ |
14 | |
15 | |
16 | -- |
17 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Community driven meta distribution or only distribution (was Re: Several portage trees) | Henti Smith <bain@×××××××.za> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Community driven meta distribution or only distribution (was Re: Several portage trees) | George Shapovalov <george@g.o> |