Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Marijn <hkBst@g.o>
Subject: Re: [RFC] obs eclasses
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:35:52 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Michal,

On 09/14/11 10:56, Michal Hrusecky wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> new versions of eclasses after hopefully fixing most of the
> comments.
> 

The download eclass speaks about ``openSUSE Build Service'' while the
other calls it the ``Open Build Service''. I note that the command
line tool dev-util/osc also speaks about ``Open Build Service''.

Others have remarked on this, but could you please explain why there
are (going to be) ebuilds that don't/cannot use the full eclass? What
numbers are we talking about?

How about using open-build-service in the name of the eclass(es)?

Finally, has this seen any testing in an overlay?

Marijn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk5xqtgACgkQp/VmCx0OL2w+aACffzDKZkDMOiKE55hh5CAS3b27
JA0AnRDZmVM3W/BuLBK0VPQEmIsYh0u6
=S84c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Replies:
Re: [RFC] obs eclasses
-- Michal Hrusecky
References:
[RFC] obs eclasses
-- Michal Hrusecky
Re: [RFC] obs eclasses
-- Michal Hrusecky
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: [RFC] obs eclasses
Next by thread:
Re: [RFC] obs eclasses
Previous by date:
Re: [PATCH eutils] Introduce has_iuse() for IUSE checks.
Next by date:
Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for items for September 13 council meeting


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.