1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:40:07 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" |
3 |
> <flameeyes@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> | This is a discussion to follow up bug #149508 [1]. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149536#c4 |
7 |
|
8 |
If I were you, I'd rather not mention that bug. Really don't see what |
9 |
you are trying to say here with that link. Plus kindly note |
10 |
|
11 |
> *Important: do NOT use this thread for considerations on QA behaviour, |
12 |
> this is NOT what this post is thought for.* |
13 |
|
14 |
in the original mail. So now if you could move to the points mentioned |
15 |
by Flameeyes in his email, it would be really useful. Additionally, it |
16 |
would be nice if these discussions involved concerned arches and were |
17 |
not done ex post in future cases. |
18 |
|
19 |
Thanks. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Best regards, |
24 |
|
25 |
Jakub Moc |
26 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
27 |
GPG signature: |
28 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
29 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
30 |
|
31 |
... still no signature ;) |