Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Thoughts about broken package handling
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 04:55:30
Message-Id: BANLkTik7qpX=MQKQxq5BqrSna6UPN_28jg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Thoughts about broken package handling by Graham Murray
1 On 28 June 2011 04:44, Graham Murray <graham@×××××××××××.uk> wrote:
2 > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> writes:
3 >
4 >> The fix for that is to slot things properly. You're screwed anyway if a
5 >> preserved library tries to access installed data that has either been
6 >> removed or upgraded to a new format that it doesn't recognise.
7 >
8 > Or some "awkward" packages which when rebuilt will still link against
9 > the preserved library, but if the preserved library is deleted and the
10 > package manually rebuild will link against the new one.
11 >
12 >
13
14 Reminds me of the other awkward behaviour I once hit where a package
15 depends on something that is slotted, and mysteriously uses a middle
16 version of the things that are slotted, and then breaks with that
17 version that it for some mysterious reason found a preference for, and
18 upon removing that particular version of the slot, it uses the most
19 recent slotted version instead, and then works perfectly.
20
21 --
22 Kent
23
24 perl -e  "print substr( \"edrgmaM  SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_ * 3,
25 3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );"
26
27 http://kent-fredric.fox.geek.nz

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Thoughts about broken package handling Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
[gentoo-dev] REMOVE Stelios Boulios <S.Boulios@××××××××××.gr>