Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: packages going into the tree with non-gentoo maintainers
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 13:32:01
Message-Id: 200609071526.06830.carlo@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: packages going into the tree with non-gentoo maintainers by "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò"
1 On Thursday 07 September 2006 13:25, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
2 > I'll try to overlook the reverted changes in kdelibs for bug fixes, the
3 > improper ${ROOT} injected in my changes where it wasn't supposed to be, the
4 > broken opengl on kdelibs checks that appeared last month, unhelpful
5 > comments when trying to achieve something from the users, a bug lingering
6 > for an year and a half because my solution wasn't good enough, and that was
7 > the solution that now kde 3.5.4 implements, decisions against the interest
8 > and request of all the users and developers, QA bugs opened without
9 > checking facts, GWN articles sent without notes on kde@g.o alias for what I
10 > can see ...
11
12 I do make mistakes too, yes. That I did revert your changes was a problem with
13 a local script - still - my mistake. No idea what you're referring to with
14 your "unhelpful comments" stanza as well as the "bug lingering around". There
15 are a lot of bugs lingering around and I do not have a todo list tracking
16 them in a specific time frame. QA bug_s_? Regarding the GWN, you should have
17 gotten the email, in which I pointed out that it's time to remove KDE 3.4
18 from the tree.
19
20
21 Carsten