List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
-- Sven Vermeulen <firstname.lastname@example.org> spake thusly:
> On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 03:49:11AM +0100, Chris Davies wrote:
>> I had the idea to build -fbranch-probabilities optimisation into
>> portage. This is where a sample run of data is taken using the
>> program compiled with -fprofile-arcs, and that data then used to
>> reorganise the object code so conditional branches are layed out in
>> a more efficient manner.
> Why implement it in Portage? Isn't it up to the user to define it in
> the CFLAGS or not?
This isn't a simple matter of turning on a compiler flag.
>From 'man gcc':
After running a program compiled with -fprofile-arcs, you can
compile it a second time using -fbranch-probabilities, to
improve optimizations based on the number of times each branch
was taken. When the program compiled with -fprofile-arcs exits
it saves arc execution counts to a file called sourcename.da for
each source file The information in this data file is very
dependent on the structure of the generated code, so you must
use the same source code and the same optimization options for
However, the problem with trying to integrate this into portage is that
it must either:
1) Compile programs on the user's machine, allow the user to run
them, and then rebuild using the generated data. Quite a
lengthy process, and fraught with issues.
2) Distribute the profile data along with the source code. The
trouble with this is that (as the man page says) it requires
using the same source code and optimization options. So not only
must the CFLAGS used be the same as with the profiled code, but
the configure settings (which alter #define's and therefore the
source) must be the same as well.
email@example.com mailing list