Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:00:11
Message-Id: CAO38tUqGbfgyTC39k_dgx=p58Hq6bMZwmaAwUZK14at5L0j43A@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr by Walter Dnes
1 On 3 January 2012 15:21, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote:
2 > On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 07:59:47PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote
3 >
4 >> I see three options:
5 >>
6 >> 1) Start migrating packages along with upstream and have everyone who
7 >> has a separate /usr (including me by the way) start using an initramfs
8 >> of some kind, either dracut or one that we generate specifically for
9 >> gentoo. The reason I suggest the initramfs, is, unfortunately if we
10 >> migrate everything, nothing else would work.
11 >>
12 >> 2) Combine the sbin and bin directories both  on the root
13 >> filesystem and in /usr by moving things from /sbin to /bin and /usr/sbin
14 >> to /usr/bin.
15 >>
16 >> 3) Try to maintain  things the way they are as long as possible.
17 >
18 >  4) Following pointers from Zac Medico and others, I've managed to get
19 > Gentoo running with busybox's mdev, instead of udev.  See
20 > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-user/msg_bc91b392ee0f76376104591cdf7dc5f0.xml
21 > Executive summary... look Ma; no udev!
22
23 Does mdev support all the rules we have in /lib/udev/rules.d/? The
24 Internet is surprisingly mute on this subject, but a quick grep
25 through the busybox source doesn't turn up anything that suggests that
26 it might.
27
28 --
29 Arun Raghavan
30 http://arunraghavan.net/
31 (Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>