On 03/10/2011 12:19 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the first GLEP is listed as Active, yet its information is out of date.  it
> talks about GLEP editors and Gentoo Managers, neither of which exist anymore. 
> basically, it still refers to the old management structure and not the
> Council.  so rather than confuse people (since we explicitly quiz people on
> this), how about this update:
> 
> --- glep-0001.txt	5 Jun 2008 06:05:32 -0000	1.12
> +++ glep-0001.txt	9 Mar 2011 22:18:07 -0000
> @@ -98,21 +98,20 @@ the form of code, patch, or URL to same 
>  
>  GLEP authors are responsible for collecting community feedback on a GLEP
>  before submitting it for review.  A GLEP that has not been discussed on
> -gentoo-dev@g.o and/or the Gentoo Linux forums [#FORUMS]_ will not be
> +gentoo-dev@g.o and the Gentoo Linux forums [#FORUMS]_ will not be
>  accepted.  However, wherever possible, long open-ended discussions on public
>  mailing lists should be avoided.  Strategies to keep the discussions efficient
>  include setting up a specific forums thread for the topic, having the GLEP
>  author accept private comments in the early design phases, etc.  GLEP authors
>  should use their discretion here.
>  

Have GLEPs in practice been sent to the forums? I think this requirement
could be dropped and just have a single place for discussion.

Regards,
Petteri