List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On 03/10/2011 12:19 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the first GLEP is listed as Active, yet its information is out of date. it
> talks about GLEP editors and Gentoo Managers, neither of which exist anymore.
> basically, it still refers to the old management structure and not the
> Council. so rather than confuse people (since we explicitly quiz people on
> this), how about this update:
> --- glep-0001.txt 5 Jun 2008 06:05:32 -0000 1.12
> +++ glep-0001.txt 9 Mar 2011 22:18:07 -0000
> @@ -98,21 +98,20 @@ the form of code, patch, or URL to same
> GLEP authors are responsible for collecting community feedback on a GLEP
> before submitting it for review. A GLEP that has not been discussed on
> -email@example.com and/or the Gentoo Linux forums [#FORUMS]_ will not be
> +firstname.lastname@example.org and the Gentoo Linux forums [#FORUMS]_ will not be
> accepted. However, wherever possible, long open-ended discussions on public
> mailing lists should be avoided. Strategies to keep the discussions efficient
> include setting up a specific forums thread for the topic, having the GLEP
> author accept private comments in the early design phases, etc. GLEP authors
> should use their discretion here.
Have GLEPs in practice been sent to the forums? I think this requirement
could be dropped and just have a single place for discussion.