Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] EAPI={3,4} offset-prefix semantics mandatory?
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:23:10
Message-Id: 20091216231851.63f48736@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI={3,4} offset-prefix semantics mandatory? by Fabian Groffen
1 Hi,
2
3 Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>:
4
5 > On 16-12-2009 09:29:07 +0300, Peter Volkov wrote:
6 > > В Втр, 15/12/2009 в 19:59 +0100, Fabian Groffen пишет:
7 > > > Should an ebuild using an EAPI that has offset-prefix support
8 > > > make the use of that support mandatory or optional?
9 > >
10 > > I think no. Without real testing that package works in prefix there
11 > > is no need to bother and create illusion that it does.
12 >
13 > Does your no mean mandatory or optional?
14
15 As I read it: Optional. And that is also my vote here, in the end we
16 have KEYWORDS.
17
18 > I'll remove all the bits from the quiz that are (no longer) relevant,
19 > and then post them, and their answers. I don't see much secret in the
20 > answers, or do recruiters want to use some of the questions for future
21 > quizzes?
22
23 Post it on -core and we can decide then.
24
25 V-Li
26
27 --
28 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
29 <URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
30
31 <URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/>

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature