Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Little prog to check compile-options for packages.
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 17:36:32
Message-Id: 20030416193641.631eee8f.degrenier@easyconnect.fr
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Little prog to check compile-options for packages. by Daniel Armyr
1 Nice script, thanks.
2
3 > I thik I am the only one in the world who is interested in this
4 > feature
5
6 I think that we are numerous to wonder which packages have to be rebuilt
7 after a USE flag change: For instance, if a user adds "gtk2" to his USE
8 flags, applications that support it will only use it after their next
9 update, whereas he may want to recompile this apps right now.
10
11 So my point is that your program could be even more useful if it could
12 show only diffs on flags that appear in the IUSE variable from their
13 ebuild. This would be a nice answer to the "what should I recompile?"
14 question.
15
16
17 Here are a few other ideas of possible improvements:
18
19 * a few options: --cflags-only (-c), --useflags-only (-u), etc.
20
21 * integration into "qpkg" (as yet another "Information Selection"
22 option). I know "qpkg" is still a bash script, but I think there are
23 plans for a python version, am I wrong?
24
25 * taking ebuilds cflags filters into account. (Because if you go from
26 "-O2" to "-O3" in make.conf, and then wonder what packages have to be
27 recompiled for optimisation, those which filter "-O3" to "-O2" should
28 not be listed.)
29
30
31 Having said that, I won't blame you if you don't want to implement my
32 suggestions. I'm not a python programmer myself, and I really don't know
33 how hard it would be. :)
34
35 --
36 Thomas.
37
38 --
39 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Talk is cheap. Was: Little prog to check compile-options for packages. Daniel Armyr <daniel.armyr@××××.se>