| 1 |
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:42:29PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:06:48PM +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
| 3 |
> > That said, I'm a bit hesitant to describing that we "recommend" it |
| 4 |
> > regardless of the situation. What is wrong with describing when? At least |
| 5 |
> > inform our users that the udev rules have evolved to more than just "detect |
| 6 |
> > and mknod" scripts and that they are now relying on files and binaries |
| 7 |
> > available in other locations, like /usr and /var. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> It looks like the situation where we will have to have one is if /usr |
| 10 |
> and /var are not on the same file system as /, because of how udev has |
| 11 |
> evolved. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
This isn't always true. I have /usr and /var on separate logical volumes |
| 14 |
(and as such, separate file systems) yet I don't use DEVTMPFS nor an |
| 15 |
initrd/initramfs, so I'm sure that the answer is a bit more specific. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Wkr, |
| 18 |
Sven Vermeulen |
Archives