List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
> Zac Medico wrote:
> I think what most people want is for portage not to pull in a package
> that nothing uses. I'm not a dev nor a programmer but I have yet to see
> any good reason for installing something that is not being used. It's
> not being tested to see if it is stable. It would have to be used
> before that would happen. Basically, it is just one more package to
> update and taking up hard drive space. It's not doing anything else.
> As for slots, if something needs it, portage would pull in the new
> slot. That's what portage does. It just seems in this case it is
> pulling in a new slot that nothing uses.
Have you considered that they might possibly be hundreds of packages that you
have installed providing functionality that you never use, but are only there
as a fixed dependencies of something that you do.
Hell lets take it even further than that, i'm sure there are thousands of
lines of code in most packages that you will never hit, so why dont we start
"masking" them as well.
I don't recall ever using grep --version, please remove (mask) that code from
grep. We will obviously need someway to unmask those code masks so lets
create a couple of files for portage. Hows....
code.mask and code.unmask with a format of....
package path/to/file line1 line2 line3 line4
Or maybe we could just let users who don't want to install python-3 mask it
_locally_. Once they need it portage is more than capable of telling them
> :-) :-)