Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
Subject: Re: RFC: virtual/shadow
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:27:31 +0100
On 12-03-2012 10:16:12 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 3/8/12 2:23 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> > And then convert profiles to the new virtual (the relevant files; below
> > are all occurrences of sys-apps/shadow):
> 
> Because of no comments, I went ahead and checked in
> sys-apps/hardened-shadow and virtual/shadow, and now made changes in
> profiles/
> 
> Please let me know if you see any problems after those changes,
> especially related to stage generation, prefix, bsd, and uclibc.

My rsync0 now spits out this message:

  Virtual package in package.provided: virtual/shadow-0
  See portage(5) for correct package.provided usage.

I did not forsee this happening, but each and every Prefix user now gets
this complaint on each and every emerge invocation.  It does not seem to
block any operation, but could we perhaps hold back further changes
until I can sort this out with Zac?

Thanks

-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
Attachment:
signature.asc (Digital signature)
Replies:
Re: RFC: virtual/shadow
-- Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
References:
RFC: virtual/shadow
-- Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
Re: RFC: virtual/shadow
-- Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: RFC: virtual/shadow
Next by thread:
Re: RFC: virtual/shadow
Previous by date:
Re: RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Next by date:
Re: RFC: virtual/shadow


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.