Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] check-reqs.eclass.patch | ||
| Date: | Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:04:15 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20062.34177.451764.983501@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] check-reqs.eclass.patch by Alec Warner |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Also it is my understanding that all tokens in $(()) go through |
| 4 | > expansion, so for instance: |
| 5 | |
| 6 | > $(( 1024 * 1024 * size )) |
| 7 | |
| 8 | > and |
| 9 | |
| 10 | > $(( 1024 * 1024 * ${size})) are equivalent. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | > Is this only in bash4? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | It's like this since bash 2.05 at least. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | > Do we have a style preference? |
| 17 | |
| 18 | Personally, I'd prefer the first variant. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | Ulrich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] check-reqs.eclass.patch | "Tomáš Chvátal" <scarabeus@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] check-reqs.eclass.patch | "Tomáš Chvátal" <scarabeus@g.o> |