Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: split up media-sound/ category
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:30:26
Message-Id: pan.2011.06.21.20.29.23@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: split up media-sound/ category by Steve Dibb
1 Steve Dibb posted on Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:55:08 -0600 as excerpted:
2
3 > On 06/21/2011 08:40 AM, Jesús J. Guerrero Botella wrote:
4 >> 2011/6/21 Michał Górny<mgorny@g.o>:
5
6 >>> media-sound/ category has grown very large and [could be split].
7 >>> [I]t contains audio players, editing software, converters,
8 >>> sound systems and a lot of other utilities
9
10 >>> What new category/-ies do you suggest?
11
12 >> I'd gladly remove the "media-" thing as a whole, and do something like:
13 >>
14 >> gfx-viewers gfx-editors gfx-plugins gfx-libs sound-players sound-radio?
15 >> sound-editors sound-plugins sound-libs video-players video-tv?
16 >> video-editors video-plugins video-libs
17 >
18 > I think 'audio' works better than 'sound' for category prefix of
19 > audio/sound related apps.
20
21 ++ to audio-xxxx
22
23 IMO gfx-xxxx looks like some texting/personal shortcut,
24 not appropriately professional for a (meta-)distro like gentoo.
25
26 graphics-xxxx would be quite reasonable, however.
27
28 > Also, leave video-* in media-video/ and media-libs/ They can fit fine
29 > in there. Plus video-players are multimedia players (they don't play
30 > back just video, for instance).
31
32 Right. mplayer, xine, etc, work just fine as for instance mp3 players.
33 So media-xxxx is fine for them.
34
35 Plus that means we don't have to either leave media-fonts orphaned or
36 find something else appropriate for it.
37
38 --
39 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
40 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
41 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: split up media-sound/ category "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>