1 |
Steve Dibb posted on Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:55:08 -0600 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 06/21/2011 08:40 AM, Jesús J. Guerrero Botella wrote: |
4 |
>> 2011/6/21 Michał Górny<mgorny@g.o>: |
5 |
|
6 |
>>> media-sound/ category has grown very large and [could be split]. |
7 |
>>> [I]t contains audio players, editing software, converters, |
8 |
>>> sound systems and a lot of other utilities |
9 |
|
10 |
>>> What new category/-ies do you suggest? |
11 |
|
12 |
>> I'd gladly remove the "media-" thing as a whole, and do something like: |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> gfx-viewers gfx-editors gfx-plugins gfx-libs sound-players sound-radio? |
15 |
>> sound-editors sound-plugins sound-libs video-players video-tv? |
16 |
>> video-editors video-plugins video-libs |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I think 'audio' works better than 'sound' for category prefix of |
19 |
> audio/sound related apps. |
20 |
|
21 |
++ to audio-xxxx |
22 |
|
23 |
IMO gfx-xxxx looks like some texting/personal shortcut, |
24 |
not appropriately professional for a (meta-)distro like gentoo. |
25 |
|
26 |
graphics-xxxx would be quite reasonable, however. |
27 |
|
28 |
> Also, leave video-* in media-video/ and media-libs/ They can fit fine |
29 |
> in there. Plus video-players are multimedia players (they don't play |
30 |
> back just video, for instance). |
31 |
|
32 |
Right. mplayer, xine, etc, work just fine as for instance mp3 players. |
33 |
So media-xxxx is fine for them. |
34 |
|
35 |
Plus that means we don't have to either leave media-fonts orphaned or |
36 |
find something else appropriate for it. |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
40 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
41 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |