Archives
Archives
| From: | Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker arches | ||
| Date: | Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:50:21 | ||
| Message-Id: | 90392edf34cd96f3a0bdcd38b9074e98@webmail.jolexa.net | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Slacker arches by "Tomáš Chvátal" |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:38:03 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Only exception from this rule are toolchain and base-system bugs, |
| 4 | > since |
| 5 | |
| 6 | In both threads you recently started, you used the term "base-system |
| 7 | bugs" but I think you mean "@system packages" - there are a ton of |
| 8 | base-system packages that are not critical and wouldn't apply to either |
| 9 | of your threads. Is this an accurate assumption on my part here? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -Jeremy |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker arches | "Tomáš Chvátal" <scarabeus@g.o> |