Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Benjamin Podszun <ben@××××××××××××××.de>
To: Hasse Hagen Johansen <hhj@××××××××××.dk>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Performance once again..
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 20:45:17
Message-Id: 1050180243.1280.26.camel@blafasel
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Performance once again.. by Hasse Hagen Johansen
1 jay:~/apache-1.3.27/debian/patches# ls
2 ab_overzealous_connections mime_type_fix
3 apxs_assumes_dso mod_bandwidth_paths
4 apxs_wrong_prefix phf_dot_log
5 custom_response_segfaults
6 regex_must_conform_to_posix_for_LFS_to_work
7 dbm_part_2_the_revenge server_subversioning
8 debian_config_layout suexec_combined
9 debian_ps_is_brutal suexec_of_death
10 debian_requires_fPIC thetarget_unquoted
11 hurd_compile_fix_for_upstream usr_bin_perl_owns_you
12
13 Uhm.. That's not really helpful for me... Any other ideas?
14
15 On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 22:38, Hasse Hagen Johansen wrote:
16 > Have you checked if debian is using any special patches for that apache
17 > version? (you can see that if you get the source package, and look in
18 > the patches directory)
19 >
20 > Hasse
21 >
22 > On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 22:32, Benjamin Podszun wrote:
23 > > What kind of Infos?
24 > >
25 > > The Apache-Version is the same, so is the configuration.
26 > > The only thing that I noticed is that one apache instance sucks up to
27 > > 99% CPU... It never uses less than 30% ..
28 > > And since this is a Compaq Server with Dual P3 1GHz and 2GB RAM I doubt
29 > > that this is right (tm).
30 > >
31 > > Any new insights?
32 > >
33 > > On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 22:24, Brian Jackson wrote:
34 > > > I think I've got to agree with Jon on this one, without more info, it looks
35 > > > like an Apache/Apache config issue.
36 > > >
37 > > > --Brian
38 > > >
39 > > > On Saturday 12 April 2003 02:09 pm, Benjamin Podszun wrote:
40 > > > > Hi there.
41 > > > > I switched to Gentoo on two of my servers recently. Before that I used
42 > > > > Debian stable with a 2.4.18-Kernel.
43 > > > > Right now the machines are nearly useless. They should serve lots of
44 > > > > pages, but every ~24h everything freezes without any load on the
45 > > > > machines.. The load drops to 0.01 and nothing is delivered.
46 > > > > Only a restart of apache resets this timeframe again.
47 > > > > Well, after searching for a solution for about 3-4 days I'm already in
48 > > > > the mood to wipe Gentoo, install Debian again and stay with Gentoo for
49 > > > > Desktop only..
50 > > > > If anyone has any suggestions I'd be glad to give them a try, but I
51 > > > > cannot afford to have two systems down on a regular basis for more than
52 > > > > 2-3 days..
53 > > > >
54 > > > > I installed 1.4, used the 2.4.20 vanilla-kernel and I installed nothing
55 > > > > special but exim and apache/php.
56 > > > > All of them use the most current ebuilds in the x86 portage-tree.
57 > > > > I wonder if this is related to the problems someone pointed out with the
58 > > > > select() performance? But it would be a vanilla-problem then?
59 > > > >
60 > > > > TIA for any suggestions,
61 > > > > Ben
62 > > >
63 > > >
64 > > > --
65 > > > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
66 > > >

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Performance once again.. Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o>