2009-08-12 20:41:30 Tomáš Chvátal napisał(a):
> Dne středa 12 Srpen 2009 19:58:05 Jeremy Olexa napsal(a):
> > I am suggesting that the new 10.0 profiles be marked as EAPI-2
> > compliant. This involves setting the content of the 'eapi' file to "2"
> > and bumping up the required portage version.
> >
> > This seems like progress to me. Often, developers are complaining that
> > they can't use SLOT syntax in profiles (I know that is EAPI-1). Since,
> > the only time we can bump EAPI syntax in profiles is upon a new
> > directory creation, this seems like a good time to me. The new
> > profiles are still in flux until the official stages/cd's are
> > produced.
> >
> > Also, another good reason is: "why not?" I don't think any Gentoo user
> > can avoid EAPI-2 up til now anyway.
> >
> > Any comments? No comments means it will be decided off-list.
> > Timeframe: 1 week from now.
> > -Jeremy
> Agreed. This is great idea.
> Also we should allow the stuff as directory thingus (portage already handles 
> it right).
> package.mask/koffice-2
> package.mask/live-gnome
> ....

+1.

-- 
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis