Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
Subject: Re: rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:16:54 -0500
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:48:25PM +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:27:47 -0500
> William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote:
> 
> > All,
> > 
> > I have recently noticed that our amateur radio applications are in the
> > category media-radio.
> > 
> > Amateur Radio is not considered part of the media, so I would like to
> > propose renaming this category to app-hamradio, or possibly moving the
> > amateur radio applications to app-hamradio if there are things in
> > media-radio which are not amateur radio related.
> > 
> I like the idea very much. But I am an radio amateur and therefore I am
> a little bit biased :). I was always confused to find them in
> media-radio. If we do the move please count on me.

I am an amateur radio operator as well, and that is why putting the ham radio
apps in"media-radio" bothers me.  Ham radio is not part of the media.
 
> But to be honest there are some amateur (ham) radio related packages in 
> other categories too (e.g. app-misc/aldo - a cw morse trainer,
> app-text/7plus - a packet radio text encoder, ..). So maybe a general
> cleanup would be good.
> 
> A quick count in media-radio gives 12 packages for amateur radio and 2
> others (the second one coming in just today). In sunrise there are 11
> amateur radio related packages and 0 others. That means a move to
> app-hamradio would leave media-radio nearly empty.

I would say that if the sunrise packages eventually get moved into
portage, they should go in app-hamradio instead of media-radio, then
maybe we could move the other ham radio packages over there, but then
what would be the best choice for whatever is left in media-radio?

William

Attachment:
pgphHbz68nUkc.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio
-- Thomas Beierlein
Re: rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio
-- Paul Arthur
Re: rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio
-- Richard Freeman
References:
rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio
-- William Hubbs
Re: rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio
-- Thomas Beierlein
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio
Next by thread:
Re: rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio
Previous by date:
Re: rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio
Next by date:
Re: rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.