On 06/08/11 11:43, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:28:47 +0200
> Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:27, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o>
>> wrote:
>>> In all cases I want one resource to look at, viewcvs is a horrible
>>> and slow interface. So it does make sense to keep changelogs filled
>>> with information - maybe automation is needed, I don't have a
>>> strong opinion either way. But don't make me do more work because
>>> you are lazy, that never ends well.
>>
>> IMO we should just make repoman commit update the ChangeLog.
> 
> What if we wanted to remove ChangeLogs then for autogeneration? Will we
> require all devs to quickly update their portage versions?
> 

Just make committing the ChangeLog fatal on the server side ;)

There are enough ways to get it done ...

-- 
Patrick Lauer         http://service.gentooexperimental.org

Gentoo Council Member and Evangelist
Part of Gentoo Benchmarks, Forensics, PostgreSQL, KDE herds