| 1 |
On 8 February 2011 01:18, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 02/07/2011 08:08 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
[...] |
| 4 |
>> The "means" are commonly used as USE flag names with "result" in USE |
| 5 |
>> flag description. Think of "gstreamer", or "xine" for example. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Both of these are reasonably well-known, libcanberra is not. Moreover, |
| 8 |
when these are available, they might represent a choice of backends, |
| 9 |
with maintainers ideally picking one that is preferable, leaving the |
| 10 |
picking an alternative choice to users. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
>> But I'm open to suggestions... |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> How about event-sounds? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> "libcanberra is an implementation of the XDG Sound Theme and Name |
| 18 |
> Specifications, for generating event sounds on free desktops, such as |
| 19 |
> GNOME." |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> http://0pointer.de/lennart/projects/libcanberra/#overview |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
This sounds reasonable. Did I miss some conversation somewhere, |
| 24 |
because it appears that "libcanberra" got finalised [1] on (even |
| 25 |
though I believe it's a horribly unintuitive name to foist on users). |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354585 |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Cheers, |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Arun Raghavan |
| 32 |
http://arunraghavan.net/ |
| 33 |
(Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME) |
Archives