On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:08:37 +0100
Tiziano Müller <dev-zero@g.o> wrote:
> > 8) EAPI 3 requires doins support for symlinks
>
> Current behaviour is to copy the file the symlink points to, right?

No, current behaviour is undefined for not a file.

> > 14) EAPI 3 supports pkg_info on installed packages
> you probably mean: uninstalled

Yup. The diff's right, just the commit message that's wrong.

> > 15) USE is stricter in EAPI 3
>
> Proper documentation for IUSE_IMPLICIT/USE_EXPAND_IMPLICIT is needed.
> In the PMS draft there's only a reference to section 11.1.1, but in
> that section is nothing about it.

I'm still not sure a) whether we want those, b) how exactly they work
or c) whether there's any chance at all of Portage supporting this in
the time we're after.

> > 20) EAPI 3 has doexample.
> Including "-r" or implicit recursive?

Nope.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh