1 |
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> i don't see a problem here. although this is something that you'd prob want |
4 |
> to post to the trustees and let them make a decision. |
5 |
> -mike |
6 |
> |
7 |
|
8 |
This is a bit of a stale thread. This particular package was modified |
9 |
to remove the SRC_URI, so it is no longer outstanding. The Trustees |
10 |
have discussed, and i'd say a majority would prefer not to have |
11 |
SRC_URI for fetch-restricted files. However, I don't believe we put |
12 |
it to a vote. |
13 |
|
14 |
Personally, I tend to not see an issue here, but am open-minded to |
15 |
specific precedents/etc that raise concerns. I think others are a bit |
16 |
more conservative. |
17 |
|
18 |
Rich |