1 |
On 23:12 Tue 24 Feb , Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> Here's the preliminary agenda. I'm running a bit behind on -dev, so |
3 |
> it's a little out of date re GLEPs 54/55. People including lu_zero, |
4 |
> cardoe, dev-zero, and tanderson should fill us in on things below that |
5 |
> they've taken responsibility for. Anyone else can chime in anywhere! |
6 |
|
7 |
I'm not prepared to decide on the whole set of solutions related to GLEP |
8 |
55 yet. I need more time to think about them, and since new options are |
9 |
showing up frequently, it makes that pretty hard. Here's what action I'd |
10 |
like to see regarding the whole thing: |
11 |
|
12 |
Petteri, Tiziano, and Alec agree to work together to update & maintain a |
13 |
single document describing our requirements, the potential solutions, |
14 |
how well they address the requirements, and what the downsides (and any |
15 |
other upsides) are. If just 1-2 of them want to do this, that's fine |
16 |
too. All 3 of them have written something along these lines already, |
17 |
which is why I suggest them. |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
> GLEP 54: handling code from SCMs better |
21 |
> --------------------------------------- |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Some discussion on list. Luca, can you sum up the state of things? |
24 |
|
25 |
Still waiting on a summary ... perhaps if Luca's too busy, our wonderful |
26 |
new secretary could do something along the lines of the above doc? |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
Making choices without a clear and straightforward comparison of options |
31 |
right next to each other is not the greatest. So the actions I propose |
32 |
for today's meeting are: |
33 |
|
34 |
- Approve new council member |
35 |
|
36 |
- Get people to agree to get a doc w/ requirements & comparisons for: |
37 |
- GLEP 54 (Luca or Thomas?) |
38 |
- GLEP 55 (Petteri/Tiziano/Alec) |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
Thanks, |
43 |
Donnie |
44 |
|
45 |
Donnie Berkholz |
46 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
47 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com |