On 23:12 Tue 24 Feb     , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Here's the preliminary agenda. I'm running a bit behind on -dev, so 
> it's a little out of date re GLEPs 54/55. People including lu_zero, 
> cardoe, dev-zero, and tanderson should fill us in on things below that 
> they've taken responsibility for. Anyone else can chime in anywhere!

I'm not prepared to decide on the whole set of solutions related to GLEP 
55 yet. I need more time to think about them, and since new options are 
showing up frequently, it makes that pretty hard. Here's what action I'd 
like to see regarding the whole thing:

Petteri, Tiziano, and Alec agree to work together to update & maintain a 
single document describing our requirements, the potential solutions, 
how well they address the requirements, and what the downsides (and any 
other upsides) are. If just 1-2 of them want to do this, that's fine 
too. All 3 of them have written something along these lines already, 
which is why I suggest them.


> GLEP 54: handling code from SCMs better
> ---------------------------------------
> 
> Some discussion on list. Luca, can you sum up the state of things?

Still waiting on a summary ... perhaps if Luca's too busy, our wonderful 
new secretary could do something along the lines of the above doc?



Making choices without a clear and straightforward comparison of options 
right next to each other is not the greatest. So the actions I propose 
for today's meeting are:

- Approve new council member

- Get people to agree to get a doc w/ requirements & comparisons for:
	- GLEP 54 (Luca or Thomas?)
	- GLEP 55 (Petteri/Tiziano/Alec)


-- 
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com