| 1 |
On Tuesday 21 September 2004 15:15, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 15:47, John Davis wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 18:41 +0200, Benjamin Judas wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > What do you think about it and how do you think this should be solved? |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > I'd say go ahead and remove it from the stages. IIRC, the acl use in the |
| 7 |
> > stages is a hold over from the 1.4 days. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> This means users will not be able to install using ext2/3/reiserfs/xfs |
| 10 |
> with acl support. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
While I don't see any problems keeping acl, it is no problem at all to enable |
| 13 |
acl's on those filesystems after installation. The default stages do not |
| 14 |
contain acl's in any case so any advantage for installing on an acl enabled |
| 15 |
filesystem are not there. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Paul |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 21 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 22 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 23 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives