Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pat Double <double@×××××××××.com>
To: Georgios Kylafas <gkyla@×××××××××.gr>, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY messed up ?
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:43:17
Message-Id: 200212170838.59724.double@inebraska.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? by Georgios Kylafas
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Copy /usr/bin/[arch]-pc-linux-gnu-gcc to /usr/bin/gcc. On my system it is
5 /usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc.
6
7 On Tuesday 17 December 2002 08:30 am, Georgios Kylafas wrote:
8 >
9 > Furthermore, does anyone have any suggestions on how to recover from a
10 > merging of that offensive portage-2.0.45-r6? My approach is to compile (on
11 > another machine) glibc and gcc (with ebuild xxx.ebuild package) and move it
12 > over to the broken machine.
13 >
14 > Giorgos
15
16 - --
17 Pat Double, double@×××××××××.com
18 "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."
19 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
20 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
21
22 iD8DBQE9/zcDdOmLNuoWoKgRAgSNAJ9xNWx/Nh0myv7wPfC4xibbNygNSwCggL+r
23 qVhjJWpKK8Yy68CioCFHbM0=
24 =T7lU
25 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
26
27
28 --
29 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY messed up ? konstantinos Dolkas <kdolkas@××××××××××××.gr>